My concern is not to represent walking as art, but rather to gaze sidelong at an activity that is irreducible to art – that exceeds art. The point is not to merge art and walking, but rather to find means that they can be interleaved. This is not to oppose art and walking – to treat them as antagonistic fields. No doubt the two share many affinities and points of overlap. It is just to acknowledge the elusiveness of both and their capacity to each mean something on their own. The blurring of the difference between walking and art seems less interesting than their multiplexing.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- brogan on Assemblage_02
- Wayde on Assemblage_02
- Etienne on Nothing
- brogan on Art and New Knowledge
- Lucas on Art and New Knowledge
Categories
Meta